| [an error occurred while processing this directive] |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Welcome to the past news archives for DRGW.Net. Here you'll
find every news story and link we've posted over the history of this
website. You can search the archives using the
search functions below. In addition, you can sign up to be emailed every
time a new story is posted, if you want to make sure you get breaking news
alerts, such as near-real time special equipment movements.
|
|
Enter a keyword or words
to search for in the news archive. Use + for a logical AND, and - for a
logical NOT.
|
|
INTRODUCING PHOTO OF THE WEEK
Posted Tuesday, January 26 2010 at 2059 h MST
Some of you that have followed the website for a while may remember "Photo of the Day", back when there were days you could actually find a photo posted. Needless to say, it just didn't work out well due to a lack of time on my part. Now that my life is starting to slow up a bit, I'm starting a less ambitious project - Photo of the Week. After all, I only have to come up with 52 photos a year. Surely even I can do that...
Subjects will be as they used to be for Photo of the Day - historic or modern images of interest to fans of the D&RGW. That can be everything from scans of old negatives in my collection of narrow gauge steamers pulling freight to things like this week's - Union Pacific's MRONY working east through a snowy Utah desert near Thompson. If you're interested, take a look [here].
If you'd like to see some of your stuff up in PotW, by all means, send me an email. - NDHolmes
COLORADO CONTRIBUTES $1M TOWARDS C&TS
Posted Saturday, January 23 2010 at 1641 h MST
The Colorado House Capital Development Committee made the decision Tuesday to allocate $1M towards the C&TS's track program for the coming season. At least some of the funding will come from the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund of Colorado's American Recovery & Reinvestment Act - aka federal stimulus - dollars. This will be matched by New Mexico, so we'll get a total of $2M for track next year. From the Colorado summary of the request, the funds will be used to "purchase and install 8,000 crossties; 24,000 tons of rock ballast; 288 barrels of spikes; 6,000 tie plates; 64,000 rail anchors; bridge and shoulder restoration; along with fuel, parts, supplies and labor to accomplish the work." Later in the request it states that this will provide 18 jobs, provide for tamping and aligning 32 miles of track, and perform some bridge repairs as well.
The Pueblo Chieftain article announcing the proposed appropriation can be found [here]. More details can be found in the Colorado capital construction request worksheet, which I've mirrored [here].
For those wondering about the history of funding for the track project, here you go. Note that operating subsidy funds are not included - this is capital improvement money only.
- FY 06-07 - NM: $1000k, CO: $0
- FY 07-08 - NM: $563k, CO: $1350k
- FY 08-09 - NM: $1000k, CO: $600k
- FY 09-10 - NM: $1000k, CO: $0
- FY 10-11 (proposed) - NM: $1000k, CO: $1000k
(Source: the above attached capital construction request worksheet)
I do feel the need to set the record straight. Rep. McFadyen was misinterpreted by the Chieftain as disparaging New Mexico's contributions by stating that, "New Mexico has been holding up Cumbres and Toltec funding for years." This is obviously not true, since New Mexico has steadfastly supported the railroad financially every year, whereas in recent years, Colorado's contributions have been only sporadic at best. What she meant was that New Mexico has been holding up - as in propping up - the railroad when Colorado has failed miserably to do so. The Chieftain printed a correction on Friday. This makes sense, as Rep. McFadyen has traditionally been one of the C&TS's supporters in the Colorado Legislature. - NDHolmes
C&S 9 TO BE LOCATED DOWNTOWN BRECKENRIDGE
Posted Saturday, January 23 2010 at 1456 h MST
According to [this article] from the Summit Daily News, the Breckenridge town council has decided where they're going to put C&S 2-6-0 #9, and it's not out where the rotary is, as we all expected. It's going to be at a prime downtown spot, in the Wellington parking lot, located at the center of
[this map], on the west side of the Wellington Road / Main Street intersection.
The site, costing the town an expected $192,000, will remove twenty parking spaces and replace them with a metal shelter for the locomotive. The town expects the Colorado Historical Society to deliver #9 around April, and its new home is expected to be completed by summer.
When I was out in western Colorado and Utah two weeks ago, I stopped over in Palisade to check on #9's restoration. I've posted a few photos of the engine from Sunday, 10-Jan-2010 in the news gallery [here].
Update (24-Jan-2010 1626h): I've gotten a couple questions now, both backchannel and via NGDF, about #9's tender. First of all, no, the restoration of the tender was not included in Braun's contract to restore #9. With that said, let's cover the short version of the sad and winding story of CHS failures with various tenders.
9's tender first went to Antonito, CO, in early 2004 for work, as all of 9 was supposed to go there for rebuilding. Shortly after getting the tender and before accepting the locomotive itself, the C&TS shop stopped work after finding asbestos insulating wrap on some of the tender piping. See [here] for a photo of it taken on 29-May-2004 sitting in the Antonito yard.
The tender was then sent to Uhrich Locomotive Works in Strasburg, CO. The CHS was deperate to find some combination of steam power that could run on the Loop. Evaluations on 9's tender showed that it as in too poor shape to be used (or at least restored in time), so Denver, Boulder & Western #30's tender was converted to hold oil for 9 instead. That's the tender it had while running on the Loop.
Given that 9 has now been out of the picture for several years and work for the CHS out at Uhrich's has stopped, there was some question as to where 9's real tender wound up. I drove up there this afternoon and confirmed that yes, it and IRCA 111's tenders are still there, and little if anything visible has been done to either. [Here's] a picture of C&S #9's tender, and [here's] the one off IRCA 111 from Breckenridge.
It seems to me that the CHS just continues to leave a wake of disasters and destruction. 30/74 is not supposed to be back together until 2018 (per reports on NGDF) at Boulder's request, due to a [lawsuit against Uhrich over some allegedly missing parts] and budget constraints. 9's tender sits forlorn and rusting while the engine has been beautifully restored, and Breck's old 111 is in pieces. I'm sure Breckenridge will notice that there doesn't seem to be a tender to go with their shiny new engine. It'll be interesting to see what the CHS tries to give Breck for a tender - 111's tender or 30/74's tender? 9's certainly is in no shape to go on display, and I suspect Boulder will be less than thrilled with 30/74's tender going to yet another temporary home.
How many millions of our public money have been wasted, and how much historic equipment is in pieces, because the CHS didn't want to negotiate a workable contract with the Ashbys up at the Loop? - NDHolmes
OUTAGE ON TUESDAY
Posted Monday, January 18 2010 at 2223 h MST
Due to a failing disk, DRGW.Net will be taking an outage on Tuesday while the machine gets rebuilt. I don't exactly know when tomorrow, but it shouldn't take more than a few hours. Sorry... Update (1/19 1730h): I think we're back. I may have to bounce the machine a few more times, but all is nearly right with the world. If you find any issues, please report them to me. - NDHolmes
|
|
![[here]](http://www.drgw.net/news/news-photos/cs-9-tender-antonito.jpg){kind=link}
![[Here's]](http://www.drgw.net/news/news-photos/cs-9-tender.jpg){kind=link}
![[here's]](http://www.drgw.net/news/news-photos/cs-111-tender.jpg){kind=link}